What interventions keep older people out of nursing homes? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Gaugler Joseph E.1ORCID,Zmora Rachel2,Peterson Colleen M.3,Mitchell Lauren L.4,Jutkowitz Eric5ORCID,Duval Sue6

Affiliation:

1. Division of Health Policy & Management School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

2. Department of Preventive Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA

3. Center for the Management of Information for Safe and Sustainable Transportation, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Ann Arbor Michigan USA

4. Department of Psychology Emmanuel College Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Health Services Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health Providence Rhode Island USA

6. Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis Minnesota USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNursing home admission remains a central outcome in many healthcare systems and community‐based programs. The objective of this meta‐analysis was to determine the efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions in preventing nursing home admission for adults aged 65 years or older.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were all last searched in March 2022 to identify up‐to‐date eligible studies for the meta‐analysis. Two reviewers screened each abstract independently. In instances where reviewers disagreed as to inclusion, all reviewers convened to review the Abstract to come to a consensus decision regarding inclusion. Two reviewers independently collected data from each report. Disagreements were resolved using group consensus. The first author reviewed the narrative descriptions of intervention components to create a categorization scheme for the various interventions evaluated in selected studies. These categorizations were reviewed with the co‐authors (second–fifth) and collapsed to create the final classification of intervention type. Study risk of bias was assessed using an instrument developed based on Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) guidance. Differences between the percentages of participants in treatment versus control arms was the outcome of interest.ResultsTwo‐hundred and eighty‐three studies with a total of 203,735 older persons were included in the meta‐analysis. Specialty geriatrics care (OR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.60–0.99), multicomponent interventions (OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.67–0.99), and cognitive stimulation (OR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.38–0.96) were associated with less frequent nursing home admission. Home‐based and inpatient/discharge management interventions approached statistical significance but were not associated with reduced institutionalization.ConclusionsEven in the face of complex care needs, older adults wish to live at home. Effectively disseminating and implementing geriatric care principles across healthcare encounters could achieve a highly valued and preferred outcome in older adulthood: aging in place.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Reference48 articles.

1. BinetteJ.2021 Home and Community Preference Survey: A National Survey of Adults Age 18‐Plus. AARP Research; 2021.10.26419/res.00479.001

2. PearsonC FieldsC.The John A. Hartford Foundation Foresight 50+ Omnibus Survey. NORC Health Care Strategy; 2021. Accessed July 9 2021.https://www.johnahartford.org/images/uploads/resources/JAHF-AFI-1-Infographic-final.pdf

3. The Harris Poll.The Nationwide Retirement Institute® 2021 Long‐Term Care Consumer Survey. Harris Insights & Analytics LLC A Stagwell Company; 2021. Accessed July 19 2021.https://nationwidefinancial.com/media/pdf/NFM‐21387AO.pdf?_ga=2.87238299.2087457810.1658239639‐481437815.1658239639

4. Adverse Events in Long-term Care Residents Transitioning From Hospital Back to Nursing Home

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3