Can triage nurses accurately interpret the electrocardiogram in the emergency department to predict acute cardiovascular events? A prospective observational study

Abstract

AbstractAimsThe prompt recording of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and its correct interpretation is crucial to the management of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with cardiovascular symptoms. Since triage nurses represent the first healthcare professionals evaluating the patient, improving their ability in interpreting the ECG could have a positive impact on clinical management. This real‐world study investigates whether triage nurses can accurately interpret the ECG in patients presenting with cardiovascular symptoms.DesignProspective, single‐centre observational study conducted in a general ED of General Hospital of Merano in Italy.MethodsFor all patients included, the triage nurses and the emergency physicians were asked to independently interpret and classify the ECGs answering to dichotomous questions. We correlated the interpretation of the ECG made by the triage nurses with the occurrence of acute cardiovascular events. The inter‐rater agreement in ECG interpretation between physicians and triage nurses was evaluated with Cohen's kappa analysis.ResultsFour hundred and ninety‐one patients were included. The inter‐rater agreement between triage nurses and physicians in classifying an ECG as abnormal was good. Patients who developed an acute cardiovascular event were 10.6% (52/491), and in 84.6% (44/52) of them, the nurse accurately classified the ECG as abnormal, with a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 43.5%.ConclusionTriage nurses have a moderate ability in identifying alterations in specific components of the ECG but a good ability in identifying patterns indicative of time‐dependent conditions correlated with major acute cardiovascular events.Impact for NursingTriage nurses can accurately interpret the ECG in the ED to identify patients at high risk of acute cardiovascular events.Reporting MethodThe study was reported according to the STROBE guidelines.No Patient or Public ContributionThe study did not involve any patients during its conduction.