Long‐term effects of premenopausal risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy on cognition in women with high familial risk of ovarian cancer: A cross‐sectional study

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo examine the effect of a premenopausal risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy (RRSO) in women at increased risk of ovarian cancer on objective and subjective cognition at least 10 years after RRSO.DesignA cross‐sectional study with prospective follow‐up, nested in a nationwide cohort.SettingMulticentre in the Netherlands.Population or Sample641 women (66% BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers) who underwent either a premenopausal RRSO ≤ age 45 (n = 436) or a postmenopausal RRSO ≥ age 54 (n = 205). All participants were older than 55 years at recruitment.MethodsParticipants completed an online cognitive test battery and a questionnaire on subjective cognition. We used multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for age, education, breast cancer, hormone replacement therapy, cardiovascular risk factors and depression.Main Outcome MeasuresThe influence of RRSO on objective and subjective cognition of women with a premenopausal RRSO compared with women with a postmenopausal RRSO.ResultsAfter adjustment, women with a premenopausal RRSO (mean time since RRSO 18.2 years) performed similarly on objective cognitive tests compared with women with a postmenopausal RRSO (mean time since RRSO 11.9 years). However, they more frequently reported problems with reasoning (odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.1–3.1) and multitasking (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.4) than women with a postmenopausal RRSO. This difference between groups disappeared in an analysis restricted to women of comparable ages (60–70 years).ConclusionsReassuringly, approximately 18 years after RRSO, we found no association between premenopausal RRSO and objective cognition.