Treatments and outcomes in high‐risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Albright Benjamin B.1ORCID,Ellett Tressa2,Knochenhauer Hope E.2,Goins Emily C.2,Monuszko Karen A.2,Kaplan Samantha J.2,Previs Rebecca A.1,Moss Haley A.1,Havrilesky Laura J.1,Davidson Brittany A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA

2. Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHigh‐risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is rare and treated with diverse approaches. Limited published institutional data has yet to be systematically reviewed.ObjectivesTo compile global high‐risk GTN (prognostic score ≥7) cohorts to summarise treatments and outcomes by disease characteristics and primary chemotherapy.Search StrategyMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane were searched through March 2021.Selection CriteriaFull‐text manuscripts reporting mortality among ≥10 high‐risk GTN patients.Data Collection and AnalysisBinomial proportions were summed, and random‐effects meta‐analyses performed.Main ResultsFrom 1137 records, we included 35 studies, representing 20 countries. Among 2276 unique high‐risk GTN patients, 99.7% received chemotherapy, 35.8% surgery and 4.9% radiation. Mortality was 10.9% (243/2236; meta‐analysis: 10%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7–12%) and likelihood of complete response to primary chemotherapy was 79.7% (1506/1890; meta‐analysis: 78%, 95% CI: 74–83%). Across 24 reporting studies, modern preferred chemotherapy (EMA/CO or EMA/EP) was associated with lower mortality (overall: 8.8 versus 9.5%; comparative meta‐analysis: 8.1 versus 12.4%, OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20–0.90%, 14 studies) and higher likelihood of complete response (overall: 76.6 versus 72.8%; comparative meta‐analysis: 75.9 versus 60.7%, OR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.06–8.35%, 14 studies), though studies focused on non‐preferred regimens reported comparable outcomes. Mortality was increased for ultra‐high‐risk disease (30 versus 7.5% high‐risk; meta‐analysis OR 7.44, 95% CI: 4.29–12.9%) and disease following term delivery (20.8 versus 7.3% following molar pregnancy; meta‐analysis OR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.10–6.31%). Relapse rate estimates ranged from 3 to 6%.ConclusionsHigh‐risk GTN is responsive to several chemotherapy regimens, with EMA/CO or EMA/EP associated with improved outcomes. Mortality is increased in patients with ultra‐high‐risk, relapsed and post‐term pregnancy disease.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3