Comparing letrozole and mifepristone pre‐treatment in medical management of first trimester missed miscarriage: a prospective open‐label non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial

Author:

Du Libei1ORCID,Li Hang Wun Raymond12ORCID,Gemzell‐Danielsson Kristina13ORCID,Zhang Zhiqiang4,Du Yanhong1,Zhang Wenju1,Xu Bo1,Wang Xiaozhong1,Wang Yaokai1,Wan Wenjuan1,Chang Ying1,Diao Weiyu1,Wang Yanli1,Zhang Li1,Ho Pak Chung12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology The University of Hong Kong – Shenzhen Hospital Shenzhen China

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

3. Department of Women's and Children's Health Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

4. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate whether letrozole pre‐treatment is non‐inferior to mifepristone pre‐treatment, followed by misoprostol, for complete evacuation in the medical treatment of first‐trimester missed miscarriage.DesignProspective open‐label non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial.SettingA university‐affiliated hospital.PopulationWe recruited 294 women diagnosed with first‐trimester missed miscarriage who opted for medical treatment.MethodsParticipants were randomly assigned to: (i) the mifepristone group, who received 200 mg mifepristone orally followed 24–48 h later by 800 μg misoprostol vaginally; or (ii) the letrozole group, who received 10 mg letrozole orally once‐a‐day for 3 days, followed by 800 μg misoprostol vaginally on the third (i.e. last) day of letrozole administration.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the rate of complete evacuation without surgical intervention at 42 days post‐treatment. Secondary outcomes included induction‐to‐expulsion interval, adverse effects, women's satisfaction, number of doses of misoprostol required, duration of vaginal bleeding, pain score on the day of misoprostol administration and other adverse events.ResultsThe complete evacuation rates were 97.8% (95% CI 95.1%–100%) and 97.2% (95% CI 94.4%–99.9%) in the letrozole and mifepristone groups, respectively (p ≤ 0.001 for non‐inferiority). The mean induction‐to‐tissue expulsion interval in the letrozole group was longer compared with the mifepristone group (15.4 vs 9.0 h) (p = 0.03). The letrozole group had less heavy post‐treatment bleeding and an earlier return of menses. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of doses of misoprostol required, the duration of vaginal bleeding, the pain score on the day of misoprostol administration and the rate of other adverse events between the two groups. The majority of the women (91.2% and 93.9% in the letrozole and mifepristone groups, respectively) were satisfied with their treatment option.ConclusionsLetrozole is non‐inferior to mifepristone as a pre‐treatment, followed by misoprostol, for the medical treatment of first‐trimester missed miscarriage.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference28 articles.

1. Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage

2. Recurrent Early Pregnancy Loss

3. Randomized outpatient clinical trial of medical evacuation and surgical curettage in incomplete miscarriage

4. Medical management of first-trimester abortion

5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.NICE Guideline No. 126. Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management. April 17 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 7]. Available from:https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng126

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3