Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine and Health, Musculoskeletal Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
2. School of Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney, Orange Campus Orange New South Wales Australia
3. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, The Kolling Institute The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
4. The University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia
5. Rural Department of Allied Health La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionTo systematically compare the global prevalence of musculoskeletal pain and care‐seeking in rural and urban populations.MethodsA systematic review with meta‐analysis of observational studies reporting a direct comparison of rural and urban populations was conducted worldwide and included back, knee, hip, shoulder, neck pain and a broad diagnosis of ‘musculoskeletal pain’. A search strategy combining terms related to ‘prevalence’, ‘musculoskeletal pain’ and ‘rural’ was used on the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and rural and remote health from their inception to 1 June 2022. Random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to pool the data. Results were presented as odds ratios (OR) along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).ResultsA total of 42 studies from 24 countries were included with a total population of 489 439 participants. The quality scores for the included studies, using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale tool, showed an average score of 0.78/1, which represents an overall good quality. The pooled analysis showed statistically greater odds of hip (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.23–2.15), shoulder (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.06–1.90) and overall musculoskeletal pain (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.08–1.47) in rural populations compared to urban populations. Although the odds of seeking treatment were higher in rural populations this relationship was not statistically significant (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.55–1.03).ConclusionVery low‐certainty evidence suggests that musculoskeletal, hip and shoulder pain are more prevalent in rural than urban areas, although neck, back and knee pain, along with care‐seeking, showed no significant difference between these populations. Strategies aimed to reduce the burden of musculoskeletal pain should consider the specific needs and limited access to quality evidence‐based care for musculoskeletal pain of rural populations.