Validation of two brief instruments (the SURE and CollaboRATE) to measure shared decision‐making in patients with restless legs syndrome

Author:

Björk Maria1ORCID,Knutsson Susanne2,Odzakovic Elzana1ORCID,Hellström Amanda3ORCID,Sandlund Christina456ORCID,Ulander Martin78,Lind Jonas79,Pakpour Amir H.1ORCID,Broström Anders1810ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden

2. Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden

3. Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Linnaeus University Kalmar Sweden

4. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

5. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden

6. Academic Primary Health Care Center Region Stockholm Stockholm Sweden

7. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Neurobiology Linköping University Linköping Sweden

8. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Linköping University Hospital Linköping Sweden

9. Section of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine County Hospital Ryhov Jönköping Sweden

10. Department of Health and Caring Sciences Western Norway University of Applied Sciences Bergen Norway

Abstract

SummaryRestless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder characterised by an urge to move arms and legs, usually associated with discomfort, pain, motor restlessness, and sleep disturbance. An individually adapted treatment is needed but difficult to optimise, which makes shared decision‐making (SDM) important. However, brief validated instruments on how patients with RLS perceive their involvement in treatment decisions are lacking. Therefore, the aim was to validate two instruments, SURE (Sure of myself, Understand information, Risk–benefit ratio, Encouragement, i.e., to assess decisional conflict) and CollaboRATE (brief patient survey focused on SDM, i.e., to assess SDM), in patients with RLS. A cross‐sectional design, including 788 participants with RLS (65% females, mean [SD] age 70.8 [11.4] years) from a national patient organisation for RLS, was used. A postal survey was sent out to collect data regarding weight, height, comorbidities, demographics, and RLS‐related treatment data. The following instruments were included: the SURE, CollaboRATE, Restless Legs Syndrome‐6 Scale, and eHealth Literacy Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch models were used to assess the validity and reliability of the SURE and CollaboRATE. Measurement invariance, unidimensionality, and differential item functioning (DIF) across age, gender, and medication groups were assessed. The SURE and CollaboRATE were both identified as unidimensional instruments with satisfactory internal consistency. No DIF across age and gender was identified, while significant DIF was observed for both the SURE and CollaboRATE regarding medication use categories. However, both the SURE and CollaboRATE are potential instruments to be used in research, but also as reflection tools by healthcare professionals, patients, and students to explore and assess SDM, and support its development in clinical care.

Funder

Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse

Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3