Association of visceral fat area or BMI with arterial stiffness in ideal cardiovascular health metrics among T2DM patients

Abstract

AbstractBackground“Obesity paradox” occurs in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients when body mass index (BMI) is applied to define obesity. We examined the association of visceral fat area (VFA) as an obesity measurement with arterial stiffness in seven ideal cardiovascular health metrics (ICVHMs).MethodsA total of 29 048 patients were included in the analysis from June 2017 to April 2021 in 10 sites of National Metabolic Management Centers. ICVHMs were modified from the recommendations of the American Heart Association. Brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity (BaPWV) ≥ 1400 cm/s was employed to evaluate increased arterial stiffness. Multivariate regression models were used to compare the different effects of BMI and VFA on arterial stiffness.ResultsLower VFA was more strongly associated with low BaPWV than lower BMI when other ICVHMs were included (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.85 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80–0.90] vs OR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.00–1.17]). Multivariable‐adjusted ORs for arterial stiffness were highest in patients with the VAT area VFA in the range of 150‐200 cm2 (adjusted OR, 1.26 [95% CI 1.12–1.41]). Compared with participants with VAT VFA < 100 cm2, among participants with higher VAT VFA, the OR for arterial stiffness decreased gradually from 1.89 (95% CI, 1.73–2.07) in patients who had ≤1 ICVHM to 0.39 (95% CI, 0.25–0.62) in patients who had ≥5 ICVHMs.ConclusionIn patients with T2DM, using VAT for anthropometric measures of obesity, VFA was more relevant to cardiovascular risk than BMI in the seven ICVHMs. For anthropometric measures of obesity in the ICVHMs to describe cardiovascular risk VFA would be more optimal than BMI.