Incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated cardiovascular toxicity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Malaty Michael M.1ORCID,Amarasekera Anjalee Thanuja234,Li Cindy1,Scherrer‐Crosbie Marielle5,Tan Timothy C.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Blacktown Hospital Western Sydney Local Health District Sydney Australia

2. School of Medicine Western Sydney University Sydney Australia

3. Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital Western Sydney Local Health District Sydney Australia

4. Westmead Applied Research Centre (WARC), Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Sydney Australia

5. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a novel class of anti‐cancer therapy becoming increasingly associated with fatal cardiovascular toxicities (CVTs). The aim is to determine the incidence of CVTs in cohorts treated with ICIs as sole anti‐cancer therapy.MethodsA systematic literature search of scientific and medical databases was performed using PRISMA principles to identify relevant cohorts (PROSPERO registration CRD42021272470). Data for specific CVTs (pericardial disease, myocarditis, heart failure, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction/ischaemia and angina), CVT‐related death and CV risk factors were extracted. Presence of CVTs in ICI‐monotherapy versus combination‐ICI therapy, and programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1‐ (PD1/PDL1‐) versus cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte‐associated protein 4‐ (CTLA4‐) inhibitor groups were dichotomised and meta‐analysed using random‐effect models.ResultsForty‐eight studies (11,207 patients) were identified, from which 146 CVTs were observed (incidence 1.30%). ICI‐monotherapy led to more CVTs than combination therapy (119/9009; 1.32% vs. 18/2086; 0.86%). Across monotherapies, PD1/PDL1‐inhibitors had lower incidence of CVTs compared to CTLA4‐inhibitors (62/6950; 0.89% vs. 57/2059; 2.77%). Based on eight studies that were meta‐analysed, no significant difference was observed comparing monotherapy versus combination‐ICI therapy (RR‐0.69, 95% CI −1.47 to 0.09) for all CVTs, or PD1/PDL1‐ to CTLA4‐inhibitors (RR‐0.27, 95% CI −2.06 to 1.53), for all CVTs including CVT‐death. CV risk factors could not be attributed to an ICI group as data was population based rather than individual based.ConclusionICI‐mediated CVTs are rare and potentially fatal. The role of CV risk factors in their development remains unclear.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3