Author:
Richards Edward P.,Rathbun Katharine C.
Abstract
One of the central dilemmas in contemporary medical practice is determining how much information a patient needs to make an informed choice of medical care alternatives. On June 1, 1982, Texas began an experiment that requires specific information to be given to patients about to undergo selected medical procedures. The objective of this uniform disclosure is to reduce the threat of medical malpractice lawsuits based on a failure of informed consent. While this is of benefit to physicians, it is unclear whether patients’ needs for information, like the unfortunate guests of Procrustus, will be cut and stretched to fit an inflexible standard. This article reviews the antecedents of this approach to informed consent, the legal and philosophical problems involved in uniform disclosure standards, and the practical problems that uniform disclosure standards pose for health care providers.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference84 articles.
1. 1. 6 Tex. Reg. 4669 (Dec. 15, 1981).
2. 16. Id. at §4.01(a).
3. The Law of Patient's Rights in Texas;Richards;Texas Bar Journal,1981
4. 21. Id. at §10.01.
5. 80. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献