Dexmedetomidine for the prevention of delirium in adults admitted to the intensive care unit or post‐operative care unit: A systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta‐analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Author:

Maagaard Mathias1ORCID,Barbateskovic Marija2ORCID,Andersen‐Ranberg Nina C.1ORCID,Kronborg Jonas R.3ORCID,Chen Ya‐Xin4,Xi Huan‐Huan5,Perner Anders6ORCID,Wetterslev Jørn7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiogical Research Zealand University Hospital Køge Denmark

2. Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

3. Department of Thoracic Anaesthesiology Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

4. Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Beijing China

5. Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine Taiyuan City China

6. Department of Intensive Care Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark

7. Private Office Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo assess any benefit or harm, we conducted a systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) allocating adults to dexmedetomidine versus placebo/no intervention for the prevention of delirium in intensive care or post‐operative care units.Data SourcesWe searched Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and other databases. The last search was 9 April 2022.Data ExtractionLiterature screening, data extraction and risk of bias volume 2 assessments were performed independently and in duplicate. Primary outcomes were occurrences of serious adverse events (SAEs), delirium and all‐cause mortality. We used meta‐analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).Data SynthesisEighty‐one RCTs (15,745 patients) provided data for our primary outcomes. Results from trials at low risk of bias showed that dexmedetomidine may reduce the occurrence of the most frequently reported SAEs (relative risk [RR] 0.69; 95% CI 0.43–1.09), cumulated SAEs (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52–0.95) and the occurrence of delirium (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.89). The certainty of evidence was very low for delirium. Mortality was very low in trials at low risk of bias (0.4% in the dexmedetomidine groups and 1.0% in the control groups) and meta‐analysis did not provide conclusive evidence that dexmedetomidine may result in lower or higher all‐cause mortality (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.18–1.21). There was a lack of information from trial results at low risk of bias for all primary outcomes.ConclusionsTrial results at low risk of bias showed that dexmedetomidine might reduce occurrences of SAEs and delirium, while no conclusive evidence was found for effects on all‐cause mortality. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low for occurrence of delirium to low for the remaining outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3