Abstract
Patients who refuse blood transfusions yet require them for continued health present difficulties to physicians. In the elective setting, physicians and patients can calmly discuss benefits, risks, alternatives and referral to special centers that have a niche practice in bloodless medicine. Care of the acutely bleeding patient who objects to transfusion presents a uniquely challenging situation. Patients may refuse based upon general health considerations or deeply held religious beliefs. In the exsanguinating patient, lengthy conversations are not options nor are referrals to specialized centers. Management of the acutely bleeding transfusion objector is presented and highlights the medical, moral, ethical and legal issues physicians will find themselves confronted with. Surgical and pharmacological interventions that may be of benefit will also be discussed.
Reference38 articles.
1. The approach to the patient who refuses blood transfusion
2. Public perception of the risk ofblood transfusion
3. MarshB MacfarlaneJ:Meat eaters face ban on “clean” transfusions amid new CJD fears. Mail Online [Internet]. 2009 Mar 7 [cited 2012 Mar 31]. Available from:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article‐1160260/Meat‐eaters‐face‐ban‐clean‐transfusions‐amid‐new‐CJD‐fears.html
4. Christian Science. [homepage on the Internet]. Boston The First Church of Christ Scientist;2012[cited 2012 Mar 31]. Available from:http://christianscience.com/
5. BBC‐ Religions ‐ Rastafari:Original and modern beliefs. [Internet]. BBC2012[cited 2012 Mar 31]. Available from:http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/rastafari/beliefs/beliefs_1.shtml
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献