Finance and the environment: The eco‐impact of market‐ and institution‐driven development in Africa using land‐use‐adjusted metrics across sources of greenhouse gases

Author:

Eneje Beatrice Chinyere1,Nwani Chinazaekpere2ORCID,Okere Kingsley Ikechukwu3ORCID,Okezie Benedette Nneka1,Oko Ali Roseline4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Accountancy Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu‐Alike Ikwo Nigeria

2. Department of Economics and Development Studies Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu‐Alike Ikwo Nigeria

3. School of Economics and Finance University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa

4. Department of Banking and Finance Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu‐Alike Ikwo Ebonyi State Nigeria

Abstract

AbstractAfrica must ensure that its development trajectories are sustainable. In pursuit of viable policy pathways, this study examines the eco‐impact of the energy mix (Te) and financial development (FD) in selected African countries. The Te path is defined using the emission‐intensity paradigm, where positive trends indicate a strong dependence on fossil fuels, while negative trends suggest a shift toward greener energy sources. The FD impact is disaggregated to recognize the separate effects of market‐based (FM) and institution‐based (FI) development. This study utilized land‐use metrics across major greenhouse gas (GHG) sources, drawing data from a panel of 33 countries spanning from 1982 to 2021. It employs a novel instrumental‐variables approach for fitting panel‐data models, addressing cross‐sectional dependence issues and incorporating heterogeneous slope coefficients using the mean‐group estimator. Empirical findings reveal that positive trends in Te have a significant and positive impact on total GHG emissions (GHGe), whereas FM has a negative and significant effect on GHGe, suggesting its active role in mitigating climate impacts. The disaggregation of GHGe highlights the distinct impacts on CO2 (CO2e), nitrous oxide (N2Oe) and methane (CH4e) emissions. Economic affluence positively impacts CH4e, while positive trends in Te primarily increase CO2e. FI significantly reduces N2Oe, while FM notably decreases CO2e. Furthermore, FI has a significant negative impact on the emission intensity of Te, indicating its role in promoting green energy transition. These findings underscore the necessity for nuanced policy interventions that integrate FD with environmental objectives, promote green energy transition and address land‐use challenges.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3