Generic and disease‐specific self‐care instruments in older patients affected by multiple chronic conditions: A descriptive study

Author:

Maria Maddalena De1ORCID,Saurini Manuela2ORCID,Erba Ilaria3ORCID,Vellone Ercole24ORCID,Riegel Barbara5ORCID,Ausili Davide6ORCID,Matarese Maria7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Life Health Sciences and Health Professions Link Campus University Rome Italy

2. Department of Biomedicine and Prevention University of Rome tor Vergata Rome Italy

3. Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences Rome Italy

4. Department of Nursing and Obstetrics Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland

5. School of Nursing University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia USA

6. Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano‐Bicocca Monza Italy

7. Research Unit of Nursing Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery Campus Bio‐Medico University of Rome Rome Italy

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo describe and compare generic and disease‐specific self‐care measures in patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) in the three dimensions of self‐care maintenance, monitoring, and management.DesignMulticentre cross‐sectional study.MethodsPatients aged 65 and over with MCCs. We used Self‐Care of Chronic Illness Inventory to measure generic self‐care, Self‐care of Diabetes Inventory to measure self‐care in diabetes mellitus, Self‐Care of Heart Failure (HF) Index to measure self‐care in HF, and Self‐Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory to measure self‐care in chronic lung diseases.ResultsWe recruited 896 patients. Multimorbid patients with diabetes had lower scores on the self‐care maintenance scale, and diabetic patients in insulin treatment on the generic management scale than on the disease‐specific instrument. Multimorbid patients with HF or chronic lung diseases scored higher on generic self‐care maintenance and monitoring scales than disease‐specific ones. There was a partial consistency between the generic and disease‐specific self‐care maintenance and management. Inadequate behaviours were recorded in disease‐specific self‐care monitoring rather than generic ones.ConclusionsOlder patients affected by MCCs scored differently in the generic and disease‐specific instruments, showing inadequate self‐care in some of the three self‐care dimensions.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe choice between generic and disease‐specific instruments to use in clinical practice and research should be made considering the specific aims, settings, patients characteristics, and knowledge of the different performance of the instruments by users.ImpactNo study has described and compared generic and specific self‐care measures in patients affected by MCCs. Knowing these differences can help nurses choose the most suitable measure for their aims, context, and patients and plan generic and disease‐specific self‐care educational interventions for those behaviours in which MCCs patients perform poorly.Patient ContributionPatients were informed about the study, provided informed consent, and answered questionnaires through interviews.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Self-Care of Informal Caregivers Inventory;International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances;2024-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3