Cost‐utility analysis and drug pricing for tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes in the Chinese market compared with semaglutide

Abstract

AbstractAimTo investigate the most matchable price of tirzepatide (TIRZ) compared with semaglutide (SEMA) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in China.MethodsThe patient cohort and clinical efficacy data were derived from the SURPASS‐2 trial. Cost‐utility analysis and a binary search were performed to identify the most matchable price of TIRZ from a Chinese healthcare provider's perspective.ResultsAfter lifetime simulation, the quality‐adjusted life years of TIRZ 5, 10, 15 mg and SEMA 1 mg were 11.17, 11.21, 11.27 and 11.12 years, respectively. Despite an initial assumption that the annual cost of TIRZ equals that of SEMA, our analysis revealed that TIRZ is probably more cost‐effective than SEMA. A thorough evaluation of pricing showed that the cost ranges for TIRZ at doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg were $1628.61‐$1846.23, $1738.40‐$2140.95 and $1800.30‐$2430.81, respectively. After adjustment in the univariate sensitivity analysis, the cost ranges for TIRZ 5, 10 and 15 mg were $1542.68‐$1757.57, $1573.00‐$1967.16 and $1576.54‐$2133.96, respectively. These cost intervals were validated through robust probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis, except for the cost range for TIRZ 5 mg.ConclusionsThis study shows that, using SEMA as a reference, the annual costs for TIRZ 10 and 15 mg are $1573.00‐$1967.16 and $1576.54‐$2133.96, respectively, for patients with type 2 diabetes in China.