“Dissatisfied democrats, but democrats nonetheless?” Unraveling the democratic paradox between populism and preference for alternative political systems

Author:

Papaioannou Kostas12ORCID,Slewe Sam3,Pantazi Myrto4,van Prooijen Jan‐Willem356ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for the Study of Politics (CEVIPOL) Université Libre de Bruxelles Bruxelles Belgium

2. Department of Political Science Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece

3. Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology VU Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands

4. Department of Psychology University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands

5. The Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR) Amsterdam Netherlands

6. Department of Criminal Law and Criminology Maastricht University Maastricht Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractPopulism presents a democratic paradox, portrayed both as a democratic threat and a fundamental tenet of democracy. We investigate the paradoxical relationship between populism and pro‐ and anti‐democratic attitudes, focusing on the role of status quo rejection, feelings of powerlessness, and social justice support. Study 1 (United Kingdom, N = 293) and Study (United Kingdom, N = 350, pre‐registered) show that populist attitudes are associated with decreased support for representative democracy and increased support for direct democracy and autocracy. These relationships are explained by status quo rejection. Study 2 (United States, N = 397, pre‐registered) experimentally shows that a populist worldview increases support for such alternative regimes due to dissatisfaction with the status quo and feelings of powerlessness. Study 3 (United Kingdom, N = 298) disentangles the pro versus anti‐democratic facets of populism, showing that social justice positively mediates the relationship between populist attitudes and direct democracy, while negatively mediating the relationship between populist attitudes and autocracy. Study 4 (United States, N = 400, pre‐registered) experimentally demonstrates that populist attitudes may lead to greater support for direct democracy due to increased support for social justice and to greater support for autocracy due to increased feelings of powerlessness. Together, these studies elucidate the complex populism–democracy nexus.

Funder

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Universiteit van Amsterdam

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3