Inter‐ and intraindividual variability in virtual single‐tooth implant positioning

Author:

Raabe Clemens1ORCID,Biel Philippe1ORCID,Dulla Fabrice A.1,Janner Simone F. M.23ORCID,Abou‐Ayash Samir4ORCID,Couso‐Queiruga Emilio1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology, School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

2. Clinic of Oral Surgery, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB University of Basel Basel Switzerland

3. Surgery Center ZIKO Bern Bern Switzerland

4. Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe purpose of this prospective study was to determine the inter‐ and intraindividual variability in virtual single‐tooth implant positioning based on the level of expertise, specialty, total time spent, and the use of a prosthetic tooth setup.Materials and MethodsVirtual implant planning was performed on matched pre‐ and post‐extraction intraoral scans (IOS), and cone‐beam computed tomography scans of 15 patients. Twelve individual examiners, involving six novices and experts from oral surgery and prosthodontics positioned the implants, first based on anatomical landmarks utilizing only the post‐extraction, and second with the use of the pre‐extraction IOS as a setup. The time for implant positioning was recorded. After 1 month, all virtual plannings were performed again. The individual implant positions were superimposed to obtain 3D deviations using a software algorithm.ResultsAn interindividual variability with mean angular, crestal, and apical positional deviations of 3.8 ± 1.94°, 1.11 ± 0.55, and 1.54 ± 0.66 mm, respectively, was found. When assessing intraindividual variability, deviations of 3.28 ± 1.99°, 0.78 ± 0.46, and 1.12 ± 0.61 mm, respectively, were observed. Implants planned by experts exhibited statistically lower deviations compared to those planned by novices. Longer planning times resulted in lower deviations in the experts' group but not in the novices. Oral surgeons demonstrated lower crestal, but not angular and apical deviations than prosthodontists. The use of a setup only led to minor adjustments.ConclusionsSubstantial inter‐ and intraindividual variability exists during implant positioning utilizing specialized software planning. The level of expertise and the time invested influenced the deviations of the implant position during the planning sequence.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oral Surgery

Reference39 articles.

1. Cognitive biases in surgery: systematic review

2. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations;Buser D.;The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants,2004

3. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions

4. Complications and treatment errors in implant positioning in the aesthetic zone: Diagnosis and possible solutions

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3