An audit of mental health questions on U.S. nursing licensure applications: Evidence to guide urgent action for change

Author:

Melnyk Bernadette Mazurek123ORCID,Holod Alicia F.3ORCID,Hsieh Andreanna Pavan3ORCID,Feist J. Corey4

Affiliation:

1. Office of the Chief Wellness Officer The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

2. Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence‐based Practice The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

3. College of Nursing The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

4. Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes' Foundation Charlottesville Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNurses often forgo needed mental healthcare due to stigma and fear of losing their license. The decision to access care or disclose mental health struggles is intensified when registered nurses (RNs) or advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) discover that licensure applications ask invasive mental health questions that could impact their ability to work.AimsThis study highlights findings from an audit of mental health and substance use questions included in RN and APRN licensure applications across the United States.MethodsA sequential 4‐step approach was used to retrieve RN and APRN licensure applications: (1) review of Board of Nursing (BON) websites, (2) communication with BON staff, (3) communication with Deans of Nursing to ask for retrieval assistance, and (4) creation of mock applicants. An embedded checklist within the Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes Foundation's Remove Intrusive Mental Health Questions from Licensure and Credentialing Applications Toolkit guided the audit. Two study team members reviewed the applications independently for intrusive mental health questions, which were designated as non‐compliant with the Toolkit's recommendations and arbitrated for consensus. States were designated as non‐compliant if ≥1 item on the checklist was violated.ResultsAt least one RN and APRN application was obtained from 42 states. Only RN applications were obtained from five states, while only APRN applications were obtained from three states. Only 13 states (26%) fully adhered to the Took‐Kit checklist.Linking Evidence to ActionThe majority of BONs did not fully adhere to the Took‐Kit checklist. Guidance from national organizations and legislation from state governments concerning the removal or revision of probing mental health and substance use questions is urgently needed to cultivate a stigma‐reducing environment where nurses are supported in seeking needed mental health treatment.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Reference20 articles.

1. American Medical Association. (2023).Licensure confidentiality H‐275.970.https://policysearch.ama‐assn.org/policyfinder/detail/questions%20licensing?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml‐0‐1948.xml

2. Substance Use and Mental Illness Among Nurses: Workplace Warning Signs and Barriers to Seeking Assistance

3. A Longitudinal Analysis of Nurse Suicide in the United States (2005–2016) With Recommendations for Action

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3