Prophylactic platelet transfusion and risk of bleeding associated with ultrasound‐guided central venous access in patients with severe thrombocytopenia

Author:

Zarama Virginia12ORCID,Revelo‐Noguera Jorge2,Quintero Jaime A.3ORCID,Manzano Ramiro3,Uribe‐Buriticá Francisco L.3,Carvajal Daniel F.2,Ochoa Laura M.2,Valencia‐Orozco Andrea3,Sánchez Álvaro I.34,Ospina‐Tascón Gustavo A.56

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine Fundación Valle del Lili Cali Colombia

2. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad Icesi Cali Colombia

3. Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas (CIC) Fundación Valle del Lili Cali Colombia

4. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery Fundación Valle del Lili Cali Colombia

5. Department of Intensive Care Fundación Valle del Lili Cali Colombia

6. Translational Research Laboratory in in Critical Care Medicine (TransLab ‐ CCM) Universidad Icesi Cali Colombia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundReported risk of bleeding complications after central catheter access in patients with thrombocytopenia is highly variable. Current guidelines recommend routine prophylactic platelet (PLT) transfusion before central venous catheter placement in patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Nevertheless, the strength of such recommendations is weak and supported by observational studies including few patients with very low PLT counts (<20 × 109/L). This study aims to assess the risk of bleeding complications related to using or not using prophylactic PLT transfusion before ultrasound‐guided central venous access in patients with very low PLT counts.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with very low PLT counts (<20 × 109/L) subjected to ultrasound‐guided central venous catheterization between January 2011 and November 2019 in a university hospital. Bleeding complications were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the risk of major and minor bleeding complications comparing patients who did or did not receive prophylactic PLT transfusion for the procedure. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to handle missing data. A two‐tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsAmong 221 patients with very low PLT counts, 72 received prophylactic PLT transfusions while 149 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between transfused and nontransfused patients. No major bleeding events were identified, while minor bleeding events were recognized in 35.7% of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences in bleeding complications between patients who received prophylactic PLT transfusions and those who did not (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.45–1.55, p = 0.567). Additional complete case and sensitivity analyses yielded results similar to those of the main analysis.ConclusionsIn this single‐center retrospective cohort study of ultrasound‐guided central venous access in patients with very low PLT counts, no major bleeding was identified, and prophylactic PLT transfusions did not significantly decrease minor bleeding events.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3