Accurate Two-Phase Flow Simulation in Faulted Reservoirs by Combining Two-Point Flux Approximation and Mimetic Finite Difference Methods

Author:

Dong Rencheng1ORCID,O. Alpak Faruk2ORCID,F. Wheeler Mary3

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas at Austin (Corresponding author)

2. Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.

3. The University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

Summary Faulted reservoirs are commonly modeled by corner-point grids (CPGs). Because the two-point flux approximation (TPFA) method is not consistent on non-K-orthogonal grids, multi-phase flow simulation using TPFA on CPGs may have significant discretization errors if grids are not K-orthogonal. We developed a novel method to improve the simulation accuracy where the faults are modeled by polyhedral cells, and mimetic finite difference (MFD) methods are used to solve flow equations. We use a cut-cell approach to build the mesh for faulted reservoirs. A regular K-orthogonal grid is first constructed, and then cells are divided where fault planes are present. Most cells remain K-orthogonal while irregular non-K-orthogonal polyhedral cells can be formed with multiple cell divisions. We investigated three spatial discretization methods for solving the pressure equation on general polyhedral grids, including the TPFA, MFD, and TPFA-MFD hybrid methods. In the TPFA-MFD hybrid method, the MFD method is only applied to the part of the domain with severe grid non-K-orthogonality, while the TPFA method is applied to the rest of the domain. We compare flux accuracy between TPFA and MFD methods by solving a single-phase flow problem. The reference solution is obtained on a rectangular grid, while the same problem is solved by TPFA and MFD methods on a grid with non-K-orthogonal cells near a fault. Fluxes computed using TPFA exhibit larger errors in the vicinity of the fault, while fluxes computed using MFD are still as accurate as the reference solution. We also compare saturation accuracy for two-phase (oil and water) flow in faulted reservoirs when the pressure equation is solved by different discretization methods. Compared with the reference saturation solution, saturation exhibits non-physical errors near the fault when the pressure equation is solved by the TPFA method. Because the MFD method yields accurate fluxes over general polyhedral grids, the resulting saturation solutions agree with reference saturation solutions with an enhanced accuracy when the pressure equation is solved by the MFD method. Based on the results of our simulation studies, we observe that the accuracy of the TPFA-MFD hybrid method is very close to the accuracy of the MFD method, while the TPFA-MFD hybrid method is computationally cheaper than the MFD method.

Publisher

Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)

Subject

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Energy Engineering and Power Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3