Global Unconventional Gas Resource Assessment

Abstract

Summary Most estimates of the resource endowment [original gas in place (OGIP)] reported for world unconventional gas start with Rogner's top-down study (Rogner 1997). That global estimate is most likely quite conservative because the oil and gas industry has discovered enormous volumes of shale gas around the world since the 1990s. The data from these new reservoirs add substantially to our understanding of the unconventional resource base. Furthermore, the uncertainty of Rogner's assessment was not quantified. Thus, considering the uncertainty, a new assessment of original unconventional gas in place worldwide is needed. The objective of this project was to estimate the probabilistic distributions of original volumes of gas trapped in coalbed, tight-sand, and shale reservoirs worldwide. To accomplish this objective, we reviewed published assessments of coal and conventional and unconventional resources and established the quantitative relationship between unconventional gas [coalbed methane (CBM), tight-sands gas, and shale gas] and the conventional hydrocarbon (coal, conventional gas, and oil) resource endowments for North America. Then, we used this relationship to extrapolate original unconventional gas in place worldwide. Our assessment of the world resource endowment established an unconventional OGIP of 83,400 Tcf (P10) to 184,200 Tcf (P90), which is 2.6 to 5.7 times greater than Rogner's estimate of 32,600 Tcf. Our regional assessments of unconventional OGIP should help industry better target its efforts to rapidly accelerate the development of unconventional gas resources worldwide. The methodology used to assess the distribution of each type of unconventional OGIP may be used to estimate unconventional gas resources at the country or basin level, given knowledge of the coal in place and technically recoverable resources of conventional hydrocarbons.