Comparison of efficacy between face-to-face and online consultation against overweight and obesity

Author:

Rubí Molina Tellez JessicaORCID,Incontri-Abraham Diego,Almeyda-Farfán José AntonioORCID,Ibarra AntonioORCID

Abstract

Introduction: Overweight and obesity have progressively increased in recent years. Online consultation has become a useful tool for healthcare professionals and patients that cannot be assisted through face-to-face consultation. Objectives: Our study aimed to compare the efficacy between online and face-to-face consultation as a strategy in the management of overweight and obesity. Material and Methods: An experimental, cross-sectional study was carried out in 88 patients between 25-30 years old. Patients were classified into two groups of 44 individuals: online and face-to-face consultation.  Nutritional evaluations were conducted in each consultation, which comprised of anthropometric, dietetic, and physical assessments. The therapy consisted of individually designed menus made by a specialist and other recommendations based on the World Health Association (WHO) guidelines.  Results: Most patients in both groups achieved normal anthropometric measurements after the intervention (41/44 face-to-face group; 39/44 online group). Intragroup analysis (before and after intervention) of body mass index (BMI), weight, and fat percentage in both groups revealed a significant improvement after the intervention (p<0.0001). Intergroup analysis of BMI (p<0.4031), weight (p<0.2265), and fat percentage (p<0.3872) showed no significant difference. The analysis of efficacy revealed an efficacy of up to 95% in the online consultation group when compared to the face-to-face consultation one. Conclusions: No significant difference was found between online and face-to-face groups. The efficacy of online consultation was 95%. These results allow us to conclude that online and face-to-face consultation have a similar efficacy.

Publisher

Universidad Anahuac Mexico

Reference35 articles.

1. OECD. Obesity Update. 2017. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Obesity-Update2017.pdf

2. Barquera S, Rivera J. Obesity in Mexico: rapid epidemiological transition and food industry interference in health policies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Sep;8(9):746-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30269-2

3. Davila-Torres J, Gónzalez Izquierdo J, Barrera-Cruz A. Panorama de la obesidad en México. Revista Médica del IMSS. 2015;242-246.

4. Barquera S, Campos I, Rivera J. Mexico attempts to tackle obesity: the process, results, push backs and future challenges. Obes Rev. 2013;14:69-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12096

5. Casanueva E, Kaufer-Horwitz M, Pérez-Lizaur AB, Arroyo P. Nutriología Médica. En: Kaufer-Horwitz M, GarcíaGarcía E, Vázquez-Velázquez V, editores. Obesidad en el Adulto. México: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2008;557-593.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3