Comparative Evaluation of the Quality of Irradiation Planning for Esophageal Cancer at the Clinical Accelerators Clinac iX and Halcyon

Author:

Lebedenko I. M.1ORCID,Kudashkina Yu. A.1,Gladilina I. A.2ORCID,Chernykh M. V.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)

2. N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

3. N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Abstract

   Purpose: To compare the quality of irradiation planning for patients with esophageal cancer using Clinac iX (Varian) electron accelerators with external gantry and Halcyon (Varian). Compare quantitative indicators of irradiation plans for different algorithms and versions.   Material and methods: A comparative assessment of the quality of irradiation planning for 90 patients with cancer of the esophagus was carried out using the indices of dose homogeneity and conformity within the target according to the data of dose-volume histograms and dose loads on critical organs. The comparison was carried out for two models of accelerators Clinac iX (Varian) with an external gantry and tunnel type Halcyon (Varian). The results of calculations of irradiation plans using different versions and algorithms for calculating planning systems are compared.   Results: A comparison of the quantitative characteristics of the exposure plans made it possible to designate the IMRT technology as the preferred one in the treatment of esophageal cancer using accelerators of both types, with external and built-in gantry. At the same time, the influence of calculation algorithms and versions of the SP on the indices of homogeneity, conformity and dose loads on critical organs is not expressed, and the calculation results are comparable within the error.

Publisher

Non-profit partnership Society of Interventional Oncoradiologists

Subject

Ocean Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3