Adherence to treatment in intensive care units on the example of pediatric sepsis: a review

Author:

Mironov Petr I.1ORCID,Аleksandrovich Yu. S.2ORCID,Pshenisnov K. V.2ORCID,Akhmetshin R. Z.1ORCID,Potapov V. S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russia

2. St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intensive care does not always require only a large amount of resources. An important aspect is the formation of a multidisciplinary team involved in the treatment of patients in critical condition. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the need for the staff of intensive care units to use protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of critical conditions on the example of sepsis in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis of publications devoted to the study of the impact of the implementation of the clinical recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign for the treatment of sepsis in children on the outcomes of the disease. The articles were searched in the abstract databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar for the period from 2011 to July 2022. Keywords were used: “pediatric sepsis”, “implementation”, “protocolized treatment”, “adherence”. RESULTS: During the search, only thirteen observational studies were found, nine of which were presented retrospectively, which can be attributed to the design flaws of the submitted works. It was revealed that the use of the entire complex of diagnostic and therapeutic measures presented in clinical recommendations and protocols for intensive therapy of sepsis in children can significantly improve the results of treatment, but the commitment of doctors to their use in routine clinical practice remains low and does not exceed 40 %. CONCLUSIONS: The main reason for the lack of commitment to the implementation of recommendations and standards for the treatment of sepsis in children is not only in the presence of organizational obstacles, but also in the absence of reasonable algorithms for its implementation.

Publisher

Practical Medicine Publishing House

Subject

Law,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Reference44 articles.

1. Гринхальх Т. Основы доказательной медицины. Пер. с англ. под ред. акад. РАН И.Н. Денисова, К.И. Сайткулова, В.П. Леонова. 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2019. [Grinhalh T. Fundamentals of evidence-based medicine. Perevod s anglijskogo Pod redakciej akad. RAN I.N. Denisova, K.I. Sajtkulova, V.P. Leonova. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2019. (In Russ)]

2. Leone M., Ragonnet B., Alonso S., et al. Variable compliance with clinical practice guidelines identified in a 1-day audit at 66 French adult intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40: 3189–95. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826571f2

3. Ioannidis J.P. Why most clinical research is not useful. PLoS Med. 2016; 13:e 1002049. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049

4. Ioannidis J.P. Acknowledging and overcoming non reproducibility in basic and preclinical research. JAMA. 2017; 317: 1019–20. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.0549

5. Munafò M.R., Nosek B.A., Bishop D.V.M., et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3