Affiliation:
1. Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russia
2. St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Intensive care does not always require only a large amount of resources. An important aspect is the formation of a multidisciplinary team involved in the treatment of patients in critical condition. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the need for the staff of intensive care units to use protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of critical conditions on the example of sepsis in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis of publications devoted to the study of the impact of the implementation of the clinical recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign for the treatment of sepsis in children on the outcomes of the disease. The articles were searched in the abstract databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar for the period from 2011 to July 2022. Keywords were used: “pediatric sepsis”, “implementation”, “protocolized treatment”, “adherence”. RESULTS: During the search, only thirteen observational studies were found, nine of which were presented retrospectively, which can be attributed to the design flaws of the submitted works. It was revealed that the use of the entire complex of diagnostic and therapeutic measures presented in clinical recommendations and protocols for intensive therapy of sepsis in children can significantly improve the results of treatment, but the commitment of doctors to their use in routine clinical practice remains low and does not exceed 40 %. CONCLUSIONS: The main reason for the lack of commitment to the implementation of recommendations and standards for the treatment of sepsis in children is not only in the presence of organizational obstacles, but also in the absence of reasonable algorithms for its implementation.
Publisher
Practical Medicine Publishing House
Subject
Law,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine
Reference44 articles.
1. Гринхальх Т. Основы доказательной медицины. Пер. с англ. под ред. акад. РАН И.Н. Денисова, К.И. Сайткулова, В.П. Леонова. 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2019. [Grinhalh T. Fundamentals of evidence-based medicine. Perevod s anglijskogo Pod redakciej akad. RAN I.N. Denisova, K.I. Sajtkulova, V.P. Leonova. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2019. (In Russ)]
2. Leone M., Ragonnet B., Alonso S., et al. Variable compliance with clinical practice guidelines identified in a 1-day audit at 66 French adult intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40: 3189–95. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31826571f2
3. Ioannidis J.P. Why most clinical research is not useful. PLoS Med. 2016; 13:e 1002049. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049
4. Ioannidis J.P. Acknowledging and overcoming non reproducibility in basic and preclinical research. JAMA. 2017; 317: 1019–20. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.0549
5. Munafò M.R., Nosek B.A., Bishop D.V.M., et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献