Abstract
In recent years, several efforts have been made to develop tomato cultivars displaying both late blight resistance and good organoleptic fruit quality. Selection indexes are considered the best option to perform genotype selection when many different traits are being considered to select genotypes as close to the desired ideotype as possible. Therefore, this study aimed at selecting late blight-resistant tomato families based on their fruit quality attributes using factor analysis and ideotype-design / best linear unbiased predictor (FAI-BLUP) index. For this purpose, we assessed the fruit quality parameters of 81 F3:5 tomato families previously selected as late blight resistant. The tomato cultivars Thaise, Argos, and Liberty were included in the trial as checks. The experimental arrangement consisted of complete randomized blocks with three replicates. Each plot was formed by five plants, three of which were used in the fruit quality assessment. The quality parameters assessed were fruit diameter, fruit length, fruit color (L, a*, C, and H), fruit firmness, titratable acidity, soluble solids content, hydrogen potential, and SS:TA ratio. Fruit quality data were analyzed using the mixed model methodology via REML/BLUP (restricted residual maximum likelihood / best linear unbiased prediction) to obtain BLUPs that were further subjected to the FAI-BLUP selection index. The FAI-BLUP was efficient in selecting late blight-resistant tomato genotypes based on their fruit quality attributes. Fourteen tomato families were classified as closest to the desirable ideotype for fruit quality. These genotypes should move on to the following stages of the tomato breeding program.
Publisher
Universidade Estadual de Maringa
Reference54 articles.
1. Alvarenga, M. A. R. (2013). Tomate: Produção em campo, casa de vegetação e hidroponia (2. ed.). Lavras, MG: Editora UFLA.
2. Arivazhagan, S., Shebiah, R. N., Selva Nidhyanandhan, S., & Ganesan, L. (2010). Fruit Recognition using Color and Texture Features. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 1(2), 90-94.
3. Bartlett, M. S. (1978). Nearest neighbour models in the analysis of field experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 40(2), 147-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1978.tb01657.x
4. Beckles, D. M. (2012). Factors affecting the postharvest soluble solids and sugar content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 63(1), 129-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.05.016
5. Beiragi, M. A., Ebrahimi, M., Mostafavi, K., Golbashy, M., & Saied, K. K. (2011). A study of morphological basis of corn ( Zea mays L .) yield under drought stress condition using correlation and path coefficient analysis. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds, 2(2), 32-37.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献