Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block versus Conservative Treatment for the Management of Anteromedial Knee Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Study

Author:

Sharma Anil1,Negi Nidhi2,Joshi Mrinal3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rajasthan University of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India

3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Research Centre, Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Abstract Context: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common type of lower extremity osteoarthritis (OA), with pain being the predominant symptom, leading to significant morbidity and impaired quality of life. Objectives: This study was designed to ascertain the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB), ensuing functional improvement and change in the quality of life in KOA patients with anteromedial knee pain and compare it with conservative treatment. Materials and Methods: A total of 196 patients were recruited for this trial and initially treated conservatively with oral analgesics and exercise. At the end of 2 and 4 weeks from the inclusion date, they were offered a crossover to the intervention with ACB for the saphenous nerve. The outcome measures, such as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Timed Up and Go test, number of analgesics ingested per day and World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) scores, were recorded at pre-decided time points. Results: After multiple structured follow-ups, 76 and 86 patients were analysed in the intervention and conservative groups, respectively. The two groups had no significant differences in the demographic and clinical patterns. The intervention group showed improvements in VAS (at week 2) (P < 0.05), WOMAC and the number of analgesics ingested per day (weeks 2 and 4) (P < 0.05). At ‘week 8’ follow-up, most patient outcomes including physical health and psychological domains of WHOQoL-BREF scores were better for conservative group (P < 0.05). The rest of the outcome measures were comparable for both groups at all time points. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: This study suggests that ACB is effective only for a short duration and does not offer any significant advantage over conservative management in the long run.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference46 articles.

1. Obesity and other modifiable factors for physical inactivity measured by accelerometer in adults with knee osteoarthritis;Lee;Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken),2013

2. Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee;Heijink;Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2012

3. Radiographic patterns and associations of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients referred to hospital;Ledingham;Ann Rheum Dis,1993

4. Where does it hurt?Pain localization in osteoarthritis of the knee;Creamer;Osteoarthritis Cartilage,1998

5. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features:Part I;Heidari;Caspian J Intern Med,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3