A comparative study of diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System and computed tomography severity score in clinically suspected COVID-19 patients

Author:

Kyatham Vikram1,Kashudu Yarramsetty Pundari1,Nagendra T.R.2,Piprikar Rama Rao1,Kogekar Rhidaynath A1,Bhargava Rahul3

Affiliation:

1. Care Hospital, Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

2. Department of Radiology, Care Hospital, Nampally, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

3. GS Medical College and Hospital, Pilkhuwa, UP, India

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) and computed tomography (CT) severity score (CT-SS) in patients with clinically suspected coronavirus disease. Methods: A cross-sectional study was done. Patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suspicious for COVID-19 were participated. Patients referred with a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) had chest CT evaluation done by CO-RADS and CT-SS, respectively, by an independent investigator. A binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the two scoring systems in diagnosing COVID infection, considering RT-PCR as the reference standard. Results: A total of 400 cases were evaluated. Two hundred sixty-eight patients with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19 had a positive RT-PCR. The mean duration of symptoms was 5.5 ± 3.4 (range, 1–21 days). The mean CO-RADS and CT-SS scores were 3.7 ± 1.4 (range, 1–5) and 9.1 ± 7.5 (range, 0–28), respectively. Air leaks, including pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and surgical emphysema, were observed in six cases. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of CO-RADS was 93.8, 80, 90.7, 92.1, and 90%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of CT-SS were 95, 76, 86, 89, and 85%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for CO-RADS was 0.943 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.909–0.976, P < 0.001] and AUC for CT-SS was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.821–0.933, P < 0.001), respectively. The cut-off values of CT-SS and CO-RADS were 7.1 and 4.2, respectively. Conclusion: Both scoring systems had good sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy in comparison to RT-PCR test to diagnose COVID-19 infection.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3