Comparing Pain Intensity of Two Instruments in Predicting the Outcomes of Patients Under Mechanical Ventilation Admitted to Intensive Care Units

Author:

Bahramnezhad Fatemeh12,Salamat Elaheh3,Sharifi Farshad4,Hasanloie Mohammad Amin Valizade5

Affiliation:

1. Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

2. Research Center of Quran, Hadith and Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

3. Department of Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

4. Elderly Health Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran

5. Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Abstract

Introduction and Purpose: Pain assessment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a main problem in mechanically ventilated patients (MVPs) as they are not able to self-report pain, hence exposing them to the risk of inadequate pain management that leads to unfavorable consequences. This research aimed to determine and compare pain intensity scores of two scales in predicting the hospitalization consequences of MVPs in ICUs. Methods: The analytical-longitudinal study was carried out in ICUs in 2020. Pain intensity was evaluated using observational pain scales in 60 patients who met inclusion criteria in three positions during suctioning once daily for 3 days. Results: There were significant inverse correlations between the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and Critical Care Pain Observational Tool (CPOT) with the duration of hospitalization and mechanical ventilation. No significant relationships were observed between total mean scores obtained from the scales and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. There were no significant correlations between BPS and CPOT with frequencies and total dose of the prescribed opioid drug. Conclusion: The use of BPS and CPOT can be used for pain assessment and control in MVPs as a positive step towards improving their consequences.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3