Histologic grading of salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A comparison of four grading systems and correlation with survival

Abstract

Background: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant lesion of salivary glands. A number of histologic grading systems are in use for MEC with variable agreement between them. Methods: This study was aimed at comparison of four grading systems for MEC: two qualitative (modified Healy and MSKCC grading) and two quantitative (AFIP and Brandwein grading). A retrospective search for diagnosed cases of MEC over eight years yielded 11 cases with adequate clinical details and histologic slides available for review. All cases were reviewed and graded as per the four grading systems. An inter-system agreement was assessed, and Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to correlate the grading with clinical outcomes. Results: A general agreement between all four grading systems was seen in 72.7% of cases. Brandwein grading assigned the highest percentage of high grades (18.2%), whereas Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) assigned the highest percentage of low-grade MEC (72.7%). The agreement between MSKCC and modified Healy was highest at 90% of cases. There was generally a poor agreement between MSKCC and Brandwein grading systems. The MSKCC grading system showed a significant correlation with disease-free survival in MEC patients. Conclusion: Hence, the MSKCC grading system might serve as a better histologic grading system with a predictive value for the biologic behavior of the tumor. Further larger studies are required to validate these findings and implement the uniform use of MSKCC grading for MEC of salivary glands.