A comparative study between first three waves of COVID-19 pandemic with respect to risk factors, initial clinic-demographic profile, severity and outcome

Author:

Thakur Indranil1,Chatterjee Arabinda2,Ghosh Ashis Kumar3,Chatterjee Shiv Sekhar4,Saha Santanu1,Panja Tanmaykanti5,Dan Utpal6

Affiliation:

1. General Medicine, DHGMCH, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India

2. Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, JGMCH, Jhargram, West Bengal, India (Formerly Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, DHGMCH, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India)

3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, DHGMCH, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India

4. Department of Microbiology, AIIMS, Kalyani, West Bengal, India (Formerly Department of Microbiology, DHGMCH, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India)

5. Community Medicine, DHGMCH, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India

6. Principal and Anatomy, DHGMCH, Diamond Harbour, West Bengal, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: During the 2 years and 9 months from March 2020 to December 2022, the SARS-CoV-2 virus raged across the country. Cases occurred in three particular time clusters recognised by World Health Organisation as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) waves. In this study, we compare the clinical parameters of adult non-obstetric COVID-19 patients admitted to our rural tertiary care hospital during the three distinct waves of the pandemic. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart analysis of 272, 853 and 97 patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 infection to the only rural medical tertiary care centre in the Sunderbans of West Bengal in the first, second and third waves, respectively, was done after obtaining ethical and scientific clearance. Clinical [vital parameters, oxygen requirement, mental status, risk factor assessment, duration of hospital stay, modified-emergency warning score (m-EWS), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), confusion, uraemia, respiratory rate, blood pressure, age ≥ 65 years (CURB65)], epidemiological variables (age, gender, and vaccination status), laboratory parameters and in-hospital outcome were recorded and analysed statistically. Results: Statistically significant (P < 0.05) m-EWS and qSOFA scores were recorded during the second wave of the pandemic. The second wave also recorded the highest mortality (14.89%) compared to the first (12.87%) and third (11.96%) waves, though this was not statistically significant. The highest duration of hospital stay was recorded in the first wave of the pandemic (mean = 9.99 days, P < 0.01). The difference in mortality rates between patients with and without co-morbidity (P < 0.05) was observed during Wave-1, across any pandemic wave, and overall but not in Wave-2 and Wave-3. Conclusion: The second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was the most severe in comparison with the other two waves, while the outcome was poorer in those with co-morbidities, especially in the first wave.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference20 articles.

1. Three waves changes, new variant strains, and vaccination effect against COVID-19 pandemic;El-Shabasy;Int J Biol Macromol,2022

2. COVID-19: Different waves and different outcomes;Patrucco;Pol Arch Intern Med,2022

3. Waves and variants of SARS-CoV-2: Understanding the causes and effect of the COVID-19 catastrophe;Thakur;Infection,2022

4. Clinical characteristics of the first and second COVID-19 waves in the Bronx, New York: A retrospective cohort study;Hoogenboom;Lancet Reg Health Am,2021

5. The impact of the first and second waves of COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria;Joshua;Geohealth,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3