Urinary incontinence prevalence and factors associated with patients talking with doctors about urine control

Abstract

Objectives: Patient perceptions of their doctors may influence talking to them about urinary incontinence (UI). We estimated prevalence of UI among Medicare beneficiaries and assessed association between beneficiaries’ demographic and clinical characteristics and whether they spoke to their doctor about UI and association between beneficiaries’ perceptions of their doctor and whether they spoke to their doctor about UI. Methods: This study was approved by the Purdue University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and determined exempt, category 4 (protocol number 1907022503, approval on August 5th, 2019). Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) 2016 data were analyzed. Beneficiaries who indicated that they lost urine control 2–3 times a month or above were classified as experiencing UI. An 11-item patient perception of their physician scale was created based on MCBS items. Perceptions were categorized as favorable or unfavorable. SAS version 9.4 for Unix was used for all analyses. PROC LOGISTIC was used to assess multi-variable association between beneficiaries’ perceptions of their doctors and talking to their doctor about UI. Results: Among 7466 persons meeting inclusion criteria, 1856 (24.9%) had UI. The perception of doctor scale scores ranged from 15 to 44, with mean score = 36.57 (standard deviation = 5.29). The scale Cronbach alpha reliability was 0.93. Using sensitivity and receiver operating characteristic analysis, a cutoff of 30 or higher was identified as a favorable perception. Beneficiaries with favorable perceptions of their doctor were more likely to speak to their doctor about experiencing UI than beneficiaries with unfavorable perceptions (odds ratio = 1.55, 95% confidence interval = 1.03 to 2.35, P-value = 0.038). Conclusion: Overall, the more favorable the perception of their physicians, the more likely beneficiaries were to speak to them about their UI.