Awareness of first aid among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

Author:

Alanazy Ahmed123,Alruwaili Abdullah123,Al-Hassan Hassan H.123,Almulhim Abdullah123,Altaher Nawaf A.123,Alhomoud Abdulraouf S.123,Alduhaish Mohammed123,Alanazi Sultan N.4,Alanazi Turki M.235

Affiliation:

1. Emergency Medical Services Program, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

2. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

3. Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

4. College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Alahsa, Saudi Arabia

5. Respiratory Therpy Program, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: First-aid knowledge among the general public is critical for saving lives in medical emergencies before expert care arrives. However, studies show persistent gaps in layperson first-aid capacity worldwide. This study assessed first-aid knowledge and awareness among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia, to identify strengths and weaknesses to guide tailored interventions. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 716 adults recruited through convenience sampling. A structured questionnaire collected sociodemographics and assessed knowledge across 12 first-aid scenarios involving bleeding control, burns, seizures, choking, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Results: Just 59.2% correctly identified direct pressure to stop bleeding, and 61.2% knew proper burn first aid. Only 52% recognized the pediatric CPR compression-to-ventilation ratio (15:2), and 36.2% identified the chest compression rate of 100/min. For choking, 73.9% endorsed abdominal thrusts for children, but only 60.9% knew backslaps for infants. Females scored higher on bleeding (94.5% vs 92.8% correct) and abdominal thrusts (83.6% vs 66.1%), while males were more knowledgeable on burns (70.4% vs 53.8%) and infant choking (81.1% vs 44.7%). Younger and more educated respondents had higher scores. Conclusions: Major gaps exist in implementing proper first-aid techniques, especially differentiation by age. Deficits in direct bleeding control, high-quality CPR, and tailored pediatric care represent high-risk knowledge weaknesses in this population. Targeted education programs focused on skill-building in these areas, particularly for higher-risk demographics like the elderly and less educated, are critically needed to strengthen public preparedness and save lives. Findings provide key insights to inform evidence-based interventions.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference25 articles.

1. First aid training for laypeople;Kendall;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2022,2022

2. Guidelines for bystander first aid 2016;Pek;Singapore Med J,2017

3. An analysis of demand for first-aid care at a major public event;Flabouris;Prehosp Disaster Med,1996

4. 2020 International consensus on first aid science with treatment recommendations;Singletary;Resuscitation,2020

5. Trauma Assessment;Kostiuk,2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3