Evaluation of Inpatients Medication Prescribing Practice at Ibrahim Malik Teaching Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Author:

Elamin Abda Kamaleldin E.1,Ibrahim Rudaina Ali M. Nour2,Ali Baraa Isam E.3,Elhag Khabab A.4,Yousef Bashir Alsiddig5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan

2. Clinical Pharmacy Unit, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

3. Department of Microbiology, University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan

4. Department of Research Enhancement, Quality Research Innovation Training Center, Khartoum, Sudan

5. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan

Abstract

Introduction: Prescribing errors account for almost 50% of medication errors and represent the eighth leading cause of death in the US. The current study aimed to evaluate inpatient prescribing practice by assessing adherence to prescription-writing guidelines and identifying the frequency and severity of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and drug-disease interactions (DDSIs). Methods: An observational-descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among inpatient wards in Ibrahim Malik teaching hospital, Khartoum, Sudan. Total coverage sampling was performed and the sample size consisted of 132 prescriptions containing a total of 700 prescribed drugs. The data were collected from patients’ files, and the completeness of prescriptions was assessed according to national and international guidelines. Drug interactions were checked by the interaction checker of www.drug.com. Results: The overall prescription completeness was 0%, and the completeness of both prescriber data and medication data were 1.5%, (0.4% for Intravenous [IV] and 0.6% for non-IV drugs), respectively. The most missing elements of the prescription were duration and qualification. Moreover, only 25% of the prescribed drugs were written in the Prescription and Medication Administration Record or drug chart, but the rest were written elsewhere within the patient’s file. The prescriptions containing DDIs and DDSIs were 49.2% and 46.2%, respectively, ranging from major (9.1%), moderate, (40.9%), and minor (28%) for DDIs, major (30.3%), moderate (33.3%), and minor (0.8%) for DDSIs. The highest percentage of drug interactions was found in the internal medicine ward. Diabetes was significantly associated with both DDIs (P = 0.003) and DDSIs (P = 0.031). Conclusion: The findings of this study reflect a real problem in prescribing practice, as no prescription was considered to be complete, and nearly half of the patients were exposed to DDIs and/or DDSIs.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3