Better among the two for Burn Mortality Prediction in Developing Nations: Revised Baux or Modified Abbreviated Burn Severity Index?

Author:

Shah Sheerin1,Verma Renu1,Mittal Rajinder K.1,Garg Ramneesh1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, DMCH, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Abstract

Abstract Background: Burns is one of the leading causes of mortality in developing countries like India. Most of the major burns requiring hospital care are not triaged adequately for the use of medical resources. An efficient mortality predicting scale would not only help in better care to those who will benefit the most but also make it easy to explain to patient’s attendants. Among the various tools, revised Baux (rBaux) and modified Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) are two most commonly used scales in developed nations. We proposed this study to analyze the reliability of these two scoring scales in our burn population. Aim: This study aimed to retrospectively study the two scoring systems and analyze them for their reliability in predicting mortality compared to actual observed mortality in each case. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on all burn patients admitted to the intensive care unit of our hospital. Data on their demographic profile, total burn surface area, thickness of burns, inhalational injury, and other comorbidities were collected from files. rBaux and modified ABSI (mABSI) were calculated. The end result in the form of survival or nonsurvival was also recorded. Appropriate statistical analysis using Mann–Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, and receiver operator characteristic curve was done to look for a better scoring system out of the two. Results: A total of 504 patients were included in the study, out of which 337 were survivors. Female gender was not a risk factor for mortality in our study. The median rBaux score in the survivor group was 100 (80–110) and in nonsurvivor group was 111 (103–123). The median mABSI score in the survivor group was 8 (7–9) and in nonsurvivor group was 10 (9–11). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve shows mABSI having better specificity for predicting mortality. rBAUX, though more sensitive, overestimates mortality than actual observed mortality. Conclusion: mABSI predicts mortality better than rBaux. A multicentric prospective study is recommended for mABSI to be used as a standard mortality predictor in burns in India.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference19 articles.

1. Contribution àL'étude du Traitement Local Des Brûlures Thermiques Étendues;Baux;AGEMP,1961

2. Major burns in cape town:A modified burns score for patient triage;Godwin;Burns,1998

3. The abbreviated burn severity index;Tobiasen;Ann Emerg Med,1982

4. The FLAMES score accurately predicts mortality risk in burn patients;Gomez;J Trauma,2008

5. Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries:Extending and updating the baux score;Osler;J Trauma,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3