Affiliation:
1. Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kayseri, Turkey
2. Department of Dentistry, Private Crown Dental Oral-Dental Health Clinic, Malatya, Turkey
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background:
Compomers are restorative materials commonly used in pediatric dentistry. It is important to investigate the monomer release of materials used especially in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the residual monomer released from different-colored flowable compomers at five polymerization times.
Materials and Methods:
Three experimental groups were formed: Group 1: pink flowable compomer (Twinky Star, VOCO, Germany), Group 2: blue flowable compomer (Twinky Star, VOCO), Group 3: white flowable compomer, A2 color of Dyract XP (Dentslpy DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). For each group, samples were prepared using standard cylindrical Teflon molds (n = 10), and the compomers were cured using a light-emitting diode (LED) source in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. During each time period, the number of residual monomers: bisphenol-A glycidyl methacrylate (bis-GMA), urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). All data were analyzed statistically.
Results:
In all groups, the amount of residual monomers increased after 1-h release periods (P < 0.05). For 2 weeks, the total residual monomers released were determined at most in Group 3 and at least in Group 1. However, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of released amounts of monomers (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
According to the study, when the total amount of residual monomer released from all groups was compared, no difference was found and it was observed that none of them exceeded the toxic dose. Flowable colored compomers can be used as safely as white compomers in pediatric dentistry.
Reference36 articles.
1. Compomers:Between glass-ionomer cements and composites;Meyer;Biomaterials,1998
2. Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials;Nujella;Contemp Clin Dent,2012
3. The effect of an additional flowable compomer layer on microleakage of Class V compomer restorations;Oberholzer;SADJ,2003
4. The effect of three lining materials on microleakage of packable composite resin restorations in young premolars with cavity margins located on enamel and dentin/cementum-An In vitro study;Rizk;Int J Health Sci (Qassim),2018
5. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs;Sadeghi;Indian J Dent Res,2009