Our Experience of Renovisceral Interventions in Patients Undergoing Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Aortobifemoral bypass is the standard recommended procedure for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Patients of AIOD presenting with claudication pain and tissue loss require revascularization of lower limbs, with few requiring mesenteric and/or renal revascularization. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing aortobifemoral bypass with mesenteric/renal revascularization in patients of AIOD with mesenteric/renal occlusion. Objective: The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) restoration of normal renal function in terms of urine output and renal function test in patients who underwent mesenteric revascularization and (2) resolution of abdominal angina in patients who underwent mesenteric revascularization. Methods: A total of 13 patients with a mean age of 45.8 years, presenting with critical limb ischemia with renal/mesenteric occlusion due to AIOD of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus D type, underwent aortobifemoral bypass with renal/mesenteric revascularization. The demographics of patients, Rutherford stage and WIFI stage, pre- and postoperative ABI, probable etiology, any renovisceral interventions done, duration of procedure, type of renal ischemia (warm/cold), duration of renal ischemia, postoperative complications, duration of stay, patency of graft, wound infection, amputation rates, and mortality were documented on a structured pro forma. Five (38.46%) patients presented with severe claudication, 3 (23.07%) patients with rest pain, and the remaining 5 (38.46%) patients with minor tissue loss. Along with AIOD, 3 (23.07%) patients had concomitant bilateral femoropopliteal disease and tibial vessel disease, 3 (23.07%) patients had unilateral femoropopliteal disease, and 2 (15.38%) patients had bilateral tibial vessel disease. Three (23.07%) patients had infrarenal aortoiliac occlusion and 10 (76.9%) patients had juxtarenal aortoiliac occlusion (managed using Liddicoat/Madiba–Robbs technique). Outcomes were assessed in terms of graft patency, need of dialysis in postoperative period, wound infection, limb survival, amputations, and mortality. Results: Aortic clamp was placed suprarenal (38.46%), infrarenal (53.84%), and interrenal (7.69%) of patients. Cold renal perfusion solution was used in 15.38% of patients with an ischemia time of 38.5 min. The average duration of warm renal ischemia was 5 min 24 s. Revascularization of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was done in 15.38%, and inferior mesenteric artery in 38.46%. Renal revascularization by Madiba–Robbs technique was done in 30.76% of patients. In 92.3% of patients, bifurcated Dacron synthetic graft was used, and in 7.69%, femoral vein with bovine pericardial patch was used for revascularization. In postoperative period, 7.69% developed acute limb ischemia, 30.07% had severe metabolic acidosis, and 15.38% of patients had respiratory complications with good renal function and no bowel ischemia. Conclusion: Renal and mesenteric revascularization in addition to aortobifemoral bypass is a safe, effective, and durable procedure with acceptable postoperative complications. The effective surgical technique of renal and mesenteric revascularization including the usage of renal perfusion solution was found to be of paramount importance in our study. All patients who underwent SMA revascularization were free from abdominal angina. All patients who underwent renal revascularization were free from dialysis and also there was a decrease in the use of antihypertensive drugs in these patients.