Anatomical and functional results of femtosecond laser-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty compared to microkeratome-assisted descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

Author:

Chacón-Zambrano Daniela12,Suárez-Garavito Jaime Andrés12,Casas José Leonardo Ramírez1,Rosenstiehl Shirley M.12,Mora Matilde12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Cornea and Refractive Surgery, Fundación Oftalmológica Nacional, Colombia

2. School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Femtosecond laser devices have been praised for their precision in corneal surgery; however, their performance in endothelial corneal graft surgery is still in development compared to the standard microkeratome technique. The purpose of this study is to describe the anatomical and functional differences in surgical outcomes between microkeratome (mk) and femtosecond laser (fs) assisted Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Methods: This is an analytic, observational, pilot study of patients who underwent mk-DSAEK or fs-DSAEK. The data were obtained from the clinical records and the institutional transplant registry with a focus on graft measurements, survival, transparency, visual acuity and was further analyzed. Results: A total of 37 participants were included in the study with 70.3% (n = 26) of them being female and 29.7% of them being male (n = 11). Of the 37 eyes, 23 (62.2%) of them underwent mk-DSAEK and 14 (37.8%) of them underwent fs-DSAEK. Optimized femtosecond laser parameters are reported. There was a statistically significant difference in donor graft thickness which was thinner in the fs-DSAEK group with a median of 110 mm interquartile range (IQR) (102.25–117.5) versus a median of 233 mm IQR (219–243.75) P = 0.00 in the mk-DSAEK group. There were no significant differences for other variables between techniques. Conclusion: Fs-DSAEK allowed significantly thinner graft obtention in comparison to mk-DSAEK; however, there were no significant differences between mk-DSAEK and fs-DSAEK in terms of transparency, graft survival, or visual acuity.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3