Anesthetic Choice for Percutaneous Transcatheter Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage: A National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry Analysis

Author:

Hickman William1,Dada Rachel S.2,Thibault Dylan3,Gibson Christina4,Heller Scott3,Jagadeesan Vikrant5,Hayanga Heather K.4

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

2. Department of Anesthesiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

3. Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

4. Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, West Virginia University, United States

5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Abstract

ABSTRACT Context: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) was developed as a novel stroke prevention alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly for those not suitable for long-term oral anticoagulant therapy. Traditionally, general anesthesia (GA) has been more commonly used primarily due to the necessity of transesophageal echocardiography. Aims: Compare trends of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) versus GA for percutaneous transcatheter LAAC with endocardial implant and assess for independent variables associated with primary anesthetic choice. Settings and Design: Multi-institutional data collected from across the United States using the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry. Material and Methods: Retrospective data analysis from 2017–2021. Statistical Analysis Used: Independent-sample t tests or Mann–Whitney U tests were used for continuous variables and Chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess patient and hospital characteristics. Results: A total of 19,395 patients underwent the procedure, and 352 patients (1.8%) received MAC. MAC usage trended upward from 2017–2021 (P < 0.0001). MAC patients were more likely to have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of≥ 4 (33.6% vs 22.89%) and to have been treated at centers in the South (67.7% vs 44.2%), in rural locations (71% vs 39.5%), and with lower median annual percutaneous transcatheter LAAC volume (102 vs 153 procedures) (all P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, patients treated in the West had 85% lower odds of receiving MAC compared to those in the Northeast (AOR: 0.15; 95% CI 0.03–0.80, P = 0.0261). Conclusions: While GA is the most common anesthetic technique for percutaneous transcatheter closure of the left atrial appendage, a small, statistically significant increase in MAC occurred from 2017–2021. Anesthetic management for LAAC varies with geographic location.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3