A Comparative Study of Regular Dressing versus Negative Dressing in Management of Patients with Diabetic Foot

Author:

Mehta Vikram Pradipkumar1,Suvariya Mayank1,Singh Shubham1,Makwana Chintankumar1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, B. J. Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes is prevalent in 10% of the population worldwide. 2.5% of diabetic patients develop diabetic foot ulcers every year. Negative dressing therapy, foam dressing and conventional dressing are common modalities for managing diabetic foot. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of regular dressing vs. negative dressing in diabetic foot patients. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted with 100 patients between the age of 10 and 85 years as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty patients underwent regular dressing, and 50 patients underwent negative dressings. Results: In 82% of patients, complete coverage of the wound occurs by negative dressing, and 52% of patients reported that complete coverage of the wound occurs by regular dressing after 4 weeks. Major post-operative complications were significantly less in patients treated with negative dressing. Conclusion: Negative dressing outperforms conventional dressing regarding wound covering, post-operative complications and cost-effectiveness in diabetic diet therapy.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Ocean Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3