Affiliation:
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
3. Department of Urology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract
Abstract
Objective:
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after initial management of Prostate Carcinoma (PC) is frequent. Subsequent interventions rely on disease burden and metastasis distribution. 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) is an excellent imaging modality in BCR. However, 68Ga is radionuclide generator produced and has restricted availability. 99mTc-labeled PSMA could be a potential cost-effective alternative. We compared the performance of 99mTc-PSMA single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in BCR with a serum prostate surface antigen (PSA) level of <20 ng/mL.
Materials and Methods:
The prospective study included 25 patients with BCR and at least one lesion on a 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. All patients underwent 99 mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT, and disease distribution and metastatic burden were compared with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were computed and analyzed.
Results:
The mean age and serum PSA (SPSA) were 69.72 ± 6.69 years and 5.65 ± 6.07 ng/mL. Eleven patients (44%) had SPSA ≤2 ng/mL. Recurrent sites were noted in the prostate (19, 76%), prostatic bed (3, 12%), and pelvis lymph nodes (LNs) (13, 52%). Distant metastasis to bones (13, 52%), lungs (5, 20%), and retroperitoneal LNs (2, 8%) were noted. Both modalities were concordant for the recurrent disease at the prostate, prostatic bed, bone, and lung lesions. 99mTc-PSMA could localize pelvis LNs in most patients (10/13, 76.9%). The site-specific sensitivity and specificity between the two modalities were not significantly different (P > 0.05). TBR shows excellent correlation with SUVmax (0.783, P < 0.001). Four (16%) patients were understaged with 99mTc-PSMA due to the nonvisualization of the subcentimeter size LNs. No patient with systemic metastases was understaged.
Conclusions:
99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT has good concordance with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in BCR, even at low PSA levels. However, it may miss a few subcentimeter LNs due to lower resolution. 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT could be a simple, cost-effective, and readily available imaging alternative to PET/CT.