Can Electrodiagnostic Tests be Omitted from Surgical Decision-making for Typical Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? – A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Sucu Hasan Kamil12,Gökmen Aytül2,Eşmeli Figen34,Özdemirkiran Tolga45

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Izmir, Turkey

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Ataturk Research and Training Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

3. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Balikesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey

4. Department of Neurology, Ataturk Research and Training Hospital, Izmir, Turkey

5. Department of Neurology, Ekol Hospitals, Izmir, Turkey

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Although carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is common and frequently seen in daily practice, diagnostic criteria remain the subject of debate. Some authors consider electrodiagnostic tests as essential, whereas others view them as an unnecessary luxury. Objective: The objective is to investigate whether electrodiagnostic tests are necessary for surgical decision-making for typical CTS. Materials and Methods: The study was planned as a randomized controlled trial. After determining normative values for the population of the geographic region, 101 consecutive cases of typical CTS of the hand (suffering palmar dysesthesia that waking from sleep at night) were enrolled in the study. Hands were randomized into two groups using simple randomization. The first group comprised patients whose surgical candidacy was evaluated without electrodiagnostic tests, and the second group comprised patients whose surgery decisions were based on the results of electrodiagnostic testing. The patients were evaluated at 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Sixty-one hands were randomized to the first group and 40 hands were randomized to the second group. Four cases in the second group received medical treatment because their electrodiagnostic test results were within the normal limits, despite the presence of typical CTS symptoms. There were no differences in favor of the second group regarding any evaluation criteria during the entire follow-up period; however, the first group reported significantly more positive outcomes regarding awakening at the 3-month follow-up and regarding satisfaction at the 1-month follow-up. Conclusion: Additional electrodiagnostic tests may not be mandatory to clinically identify classical CTS or make surgical decisions in these cases. However, many cases may be caused by entrapment of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel, but they may lack typical CTS symptoms, such as waking from night-time sleep. In such cases, properly applied electrodiagnostic tests may be of immense help.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3