Comparative Analysis of Various Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Treatment

Author:

Mirza Mubashir Baig1,Sharma Kirti2,Shetty Chitharanjan3,Gupta Jayantika4,Padariya Kinjal5,Chohan Hitesh6,Pius Alen7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Conservative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin AbdulAziz University, AlKharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vyas Dental College Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

3. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte Deemed to be University, Derlakatte Mangalore, Karnataka, India

4. BDS, Dental Surgeon, Smile Architects, Amritsar, Punjab, India

5. BDS, K.M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

6. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

7. Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Malabar Dental College, Edappal, Kerala, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Root canal treatment (RCT)” is essential in preserving natural dentition by eliminating infection within the root canal system. Irrigation solutions play a crucial role in achieving successful RCT outcomes by facilitating disinfection and debris removal. Methods: An in vitro experimental design was employed to evaluate the irrigation solutions. Antimicrobial efficacy was assessed using agar diffusion assays against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. Tissue dissolution ability was evaluated by measuring the weight loss of dentin specimens. Cytotoxicity was assessed using cell viability assays with human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. Results: NaOCl demonstrated the highest antimicrobial efficacy, while EDTA exhibited superior tissue dissolution ability. CHX and QMix displayed lower cytotoxicity compared to NaOCl and EDTA. Conclusion: The choice of irrigation solution in RCT should consider factors such as antimicrobial efficacy, tissue dissolution ability, and cytotoxicity. NaOCl remains effective but has high cytotoxicity, whereas CHX and QMix offer alternatives with lower cytotoxicity. EDTA is effective in tissue dissolution but should be used cautiously due to cytotoxic potential. Clinicians should weigh the benefits and limitations of each solution for optimal treatment outcomes.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference9 articles.

1. Irrigation in endodontics;Haapasalo;Dent Clin North Am,2010

2. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics;Mohammadi;Int Endod J,2009

3. Chlorhexidine in endodontics;Gomes;Braz Dent J,2013

4. Root canal irrigants;Zehnder;J Endod,2006

5. Antimicrobial substantivity over time of chlorhexidine and cetrimide;Baca;J Endod,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3