Comparison of Maintenance in Different Materials for Implant Dental Prostheses

Author:

Suman Neelam1,Munuganti Niharika2,Duseja Sareen3,Abdul Hina Naim4,Puthenkandathil Rahul5,Choithani Kishan K.6,Kumar Ashok7,Patel Vilas3,Kommuri Sirisha3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, SGRD Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India

2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Tirumala Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bardipur, Nizamabad, Telangana, India

3. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Narsinhbhai Patel Dental College and Hospital, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India

4. Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Nitte (Deemed to be University), AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

6. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dental Science, Amargadh, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India

7. Department of General Surgerey, GMC, Amirstar, Punjab, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Context: In contemporary prosthodontics, implant-supported dental prostheses are frequently utilized to restore function and esthetics for individuals who are edentulous. The prosthetic material selection has a big impact on long-term performance and maintenance needs. Methods: A retrospective review of patient files from the dental implant clinic of a tertiary care facility was done. Included were patients who had dental prosthesis supported by implants between January 2018 and December 2022. Data were gathered and examined on the prosthesis material, follow-up visits, and maintenance interventions (adjustments, repairs, and replacements). Results: Materials for 50 prostheses made of porcelain, 45 prostheses made of acrylic, 35 prostheses made of metal, and 40 prostheses made of composite were assessed. When it came to modifications and repairs, porcelain prosthesis needed less work than acrylic prostheses. Composite prostheses required the least amount of maintenance overall, whereas metal prostheses indicated a considerable demand for maintenance. Conclusion: Superior durability is provided by porcelain, frequent repairs are needed for acrylic, structural strength is provided by metal, and composite material gives promising esthetics with low maintenance requirements. These results highlight how crucial it is to take material properties into account when choosing a prosthesis to maximize long-term results and patient happiness.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference10 articles.

1. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains;Kim;J Dent,2012

2. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II:Core and veneer materials;Heffernan;J Prosthet Dent,2002

3. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations:A review of the literature;Sadowsky;J Prosthet Dent,2006

4. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses after a mean observation period of at least 5 years;Pjetursson;Clin Oral Implants Res,2018

5. Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service;Gehrt;Clin Oral Invest,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3