T3-T5 Thoracoscopic sympathectomy versus sympathicotomy in the treatment of palmar–axillary–plantar hyperhidrosis

Author:

Mahmoud Mohamed Mostafa,Allah Abd Elhady Mohamed Abd,Mohamed Mohamed Khidr,Abdu Mohamed Elsaeed

Abstract

Background Compensatory hyperhidrosis is a common complication after thoracoscopic interruption of the sympathetic chain in hyperhidrosis patients. Nonetheless, no interruption technique has been defined to decrease the incidence of that dreadful complication. Herein, we compared T3-5 sympathectomy with sympathicotomy at the same levels with regard to postoperative outcomes. Methods Eighty patients diagnosed with primary palmar–axillary–plantar hyperhidrosis were randomized into two equal groups: the sympathectomy and sympathicotomy groups. They were followed up for 6 months after the procedure. The incidence and criteria of compensatory hyperhidrosis were compared between the two approaches. Results The sympathectomy group showed a significant prolongation of the operative time. However, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and the incidence of complications were statistically comparable between the two approaches. Both procedures were associated with a significant decline in the severity of sweating in the three regions, which was more prominent in the palmar and axillary regions compared with the foot. The incidence of compensatory hyperhidrosis was 65% in sympathectomy patients and 77.5% in sympathicotomy patients, with no significant difference between them (P=0.217). About two-thirds of these cases were temporary, and the majority of them had mild to moderate symptoms. Patient satisfaction did not differ between the two approaches, with poor satisfaction in patients with permanent compensatory hyperhidrosis. Conclusion Both sympathectomy and sympathicotomy had comparable outcomes in patients with palmar–axillary–plantar hyperhidrosis, manifested in comparable decreased sweating severity, incidence of compensatory hyperhidrosis, quality of life, and patient satisfaction.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Ocean Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3