A comparison of two chemotherapy regimens in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic salivary gland carcinoma

Author:

Ameri Ahmad1,Sourati Ainaz1,Behzadi Behnaz1,Lesan Mansour1,Taghizadeh-Hesary Farzad23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Oncology, Imam Hossein Educational Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2. ENT and Head and Neck Research Center and Department, The Five Senses Health Institute, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3. Radiation Oncology Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of chemotherapy in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic salivary gland carcinomas (LA-R/M SGCs) is still undefined. We aimed to compare the efficacy of two chemotherapy regimens in LA-R/M SGC. Materials and Methods: This prospective study compared paclitaxel (Taxol) plus carboplatin (TC) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin (CAP) regimen in terms of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between October 2011 and April 2019, 48 patients with LA-R/M SGCs were recruited. The ORRs of first-line TC and CAP regimens were 54.2% and 36.3%, respectively (P = 0.57). The ORRs in recurrent and de novo metastatic patients were 50.0% and 37.5% for TC and CAP, respectively (P = 0.26). The median PFS of TC and CAP arms were 10.2 and 11.9 months, respectively (P = 0.91). In the subanalysis, patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) had longer PFS in the TC arm (14.5 vs. 8.2 months, P = 0.03), irrespective of the tumor grade (low grade: 16.3 vs. 8.9 months, high grade: 11.7 vs. 4.5 months; P = 0.03). The median OS rates were 45.5 and 19.5 months for TC and CAP groups, respectively (P = 0.71). Conclusion: For patients with LA-R/M SGC, there was no significant difference between first-line TC and CAP in terms of ORR, PFS, and OS.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3