Long-term Clinical Outcome of Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Author:

Ge Xiaolin1,Yang Xi1,Lu Xiaohu2,Wen Wei2,Zhen Fuxi2,Ye Hongxun3,Zhu Hongcheng1,Cao Yuandong1,Zhang Sheng1,Cheng Hongyan4,Ma Jianxin5,Yang Baixia6,Dai Shengbin7,Guo Qing7,Cai Jing6,Sun Xinchen1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing - China

2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing - China

3. Department of Radiotherapy, Taixing People's Hospital, Taixing - China

4. Department of Synthetic Internal Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing - China

5. Department of Radiotherapy, Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Hospital Affiliated to Bengbu Medical College, Lianyungang - China

6. Department of Radiotherapy, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong - China

7. Department of Radiotherapy, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou - China

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Between August 2009 and December 2011, 112 patients with pathologically confirmed ESCC treated with IMRT at Jiangsu Province People's Hospital and Nantong Tumor Hospital were included in a retrospective analysis. Patients received either IMRT alone (group A) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (group B). A radiation dose of 60–66 Gy administered in 30–33 fractions was delivered to the tumor. The patients in group B simultaneously received 2 cycles of cisplatin-based doublets with either 5-fluorouracil or taxotere. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute the survival time. Early and late toxicities were scored according to CTCAE v.3.0. Results The response rate of group B (91.07%) was not significantly greater than that of group A (89.29%) (X2 = 0.10, p = 0.75). The 1- and 3-year survival rates of group B (87.5% and 57.14%, respectively) were greater than those of group A (69.64% and 37.50%, respectively). The difference in overall survival was statistically significant between groups A and B (x2 = 5.30, p = 0.02; x2 = 4.33, p = 0.04). Hematological toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, and treatment-related esophagitis were significantly higher in group B than group A (16.07% vs. 33.93%, p = 0.04; 10.71% vs. 26.79%, p = 0.03; 19.64% vs. 44.64%, p = 0.01). However, intergroup differences in terms of late toxicity were not significant. Conclusions IMRT was a practical and feasible technique to treat ESCC. Concurrent CRT could increase local tumor control and long-term survival. The CRT regimen was associated with a higher incidence of acute gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology,General Medicine

全球学者库

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"全球学者库"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前全球学者库共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2023 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3