1. AMAP, 1998. AMAP Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway.
2. Axenfeld, F., Münch, J., Pacyna, J.M., 1991. Belastung von Nord-und Ostsee durch Ökologisch gefähriliche Stoffe am Beispiel atmosphärischer Quecksilber-komponenten. Dornier Report, Friedrichshafen, Germany, November.
3. EU, 2001. A position paper on mercury for the directive of the European parliament and of the council relating to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, nickel and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons EU: in ambient air. Brussels, Belgium.
4. Munthe, J., 2000. Mercury species over Europe: relative importance of depositional methylmercury fluxes to various ecosystems (MOE). ELOISE Implementation Report. Phase 2. European Commission (EC) Ecosystems Research Report 33, Brussels, Belgium.
5. Pacyna, J.M., 1997. Practical opportunities and technologies available to reduce anthropogenic emissions of mercury to the environment and to reduce the risks of mercury exposure to humans and the environment. A Report for the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) in North America, Montreal, Canada.