A Thurstonian comparison of the Tetrad and Degree of Difference tests-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Thurstonian comparison of the Tetrad and Degree of Difference tests

Published:2015-03 Issue: Volume:40 Page:263-269
ISSN:0950-3293
Container-title:Food Quality and Preference
language:en
Short-container-title:Food Quality and Preference

Author:

Ennis John M.,Christensen Rune

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Food Science

Reference42 articles.

1. Sensory difference tests: Overdispersion and warm-up;Angulo;Food Quality and Preference,2007

2. How to estimate and use the variance of d′ from difference tests;Bi;Journal of Sensory Studies,1997

3. Variance of d′ for the Tetrad test and comparisons with other forced-choice methods;Bi;Journal of Sensory Studies,2013

4. Thurstonian models for sensory discrimination tests as generalized linear models;Brockhoff;Food Quality and Preference,2010

5. Christensen, R. H. B. (2011). Statistical methodology for sensory discrimination tests and its implementation in sensR. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The observed variance of dʹ estimates compared across the 2-AFCR, Triangle, and Tetrad tasks;Food Quality and Preference;2022-09

2. An Overview of Sensory Characterization Techniques: From Classical Descriptive Analysis to the Emergence of Novel Profiling Methods;Foods;2022-01-18

3. Does the τ estimate from same-different test data represent a relevant sensory effect size for determining sensory equivalency?;Food Quality and Preference;2019-07

4. How task instructions affect performance on the unspecified tetrad test;Journal of Sensory Studies;2018-05-16

5. Comparative categorization method: Using 2-AFC strategy in constant-reference duo-trio for discrimination of multiple stimuli from a reference;Food Quality and Preference;2017-12