Editorial Commentary: Leveraging the Literature: What Can a Half-Century's Worth of Studies Tell Us About Recurrent Instability Following Primary Shoulder Dislocation?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Editorial Commentary: Leveraging the Literature: What Can a Half-Century's Worth of Studies Tell Us About Recurrent Instability Following Primary Shoulder Dislocation?

Published:2017-10 Issue:10 Volume:33 Page:1882-1883
ISSN:0749-8063
Container-title:Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Author:

Cote Mark P.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference5 articles.

1. Does study design affect redislocation rates after primary shoulder dislocation? A systematic review comparing prospective and retrospective studies;Gohal;Arthroscopy,2017

2. A systematic review of meta-analyses published in Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery;Cote;Arthroscopy,2016

3. Research pearls: The significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 3: Pearls and pitfalls of meta-analyses and systematic reviews;Harris;Arthroscopy,2017

4. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions;Higgins,2008

5. Current status of evidence-based sports medicine;Harris;Arthroscopy,2014

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Consumer research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review;Nankai Business Review International;2022-09-01

2. Reviews Pooling Heterogeneous, Low-Evidence, High-Bias Data Result in Incorrect Conclusions: But Heterogeneity is an Opportunity to Explore;Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery;2018-12

3. Where Do Arthroscopy Editors Stand on Systematic Reviews of the Literature?;Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery;2017-10