Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracy

Published:2011-08 Issue:8 Volume:64 Page:861-871
ISSN:0895-4356
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Author:

Hartling Lisa,Bond Kenneth,Santaguida P. Lina,Viswanathan Meera,Dryden Donna M.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Epidemiology

Reference12 articles.

1. Systematic reviews of observational studies;Egger,2001

2. Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms;Chou;Ann Intern Med,2005

3. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions;McCulloch;BMJ,2002

4. Challenges in systematic reviews of education intervention studies;Reed;Ann Intern Med,2005

5. Better information for better health care: the evidence-based practice center program and the agency for healthcare research and quality;Atkins;Ann Intern Med,2005

Cited by 53 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis;HRB Open Research;2024-06-18

2. Problematic meta-analyses: Bayesian and frequentist perspectives on combining randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies;BMC Medical Research Methodology;2024-04-27

3. Adherence enhancing interventions for pharmacological and oxygen therapy in patients with COPD: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analyses;Systematic Reviews;2023-09-08

4. Clinically Relevant Evidence regarding Digital Phenotyping of Suicide Risk among Military/Veteran Cohorts is Limited: A Secondary Review. (Preprint);2023-08-22

5. Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews;Systematic Reviews;2023-06-08